Follow-up of follow-up (spring 2016)
. My last blog post summarised my academic output in terms of texts that I have been working on during the spring term (Jan-June). This blog post is a (mostly quantitative) analysis of those texts/pieces of output in the form of eight observations. There is one outlier (15 co-authors) that gets special treatment here. Here's a breakdown of the type of texts I have been working on during the spring: - 8 conference papers (6 accepted, 2 rejected) - 6 journal articles (1 published, 2 in press, 1 being in review and 2 special issue article proposals (abstracts) being in review) - 2 book chapter proposals (both accepted) - 2 workshop proposals (both accepted) Observation 1 : I haven't written a single text by myself - all the texts have co-authors. Five of the 18 texts have been written by two authors (me and someone else) and another five has three authors. Two texts each have four, five and six authors respectively, one has seven authors and one has 15 authors. The works...